Sunday, December 5, 2010

Marriage: The Gay Agenda

Word Count: 1976

12.6.2010

Marriage: "The Gay Agenda"

           Since I’ve started to think about marriage as it affects my life, I’ve become more aware of the bigotry and oppression in the institution of marriage in America. In my life, the marriages that I’ve heard of have taken place for love. Growing up, I learned that, in actuality, a lot more goes into the process of marriage than I knew. I’ve started to realize that interracial couples and their plight, as seen in Loving v. Virginia, are much like the same-sex couples of today. Many of the arguments being used against single sex partnerships today are similar to those used to defend anti-miscegenation laws. Interracial marriage was rumored to be an abomination that couldn’t produce viable offspring, and its ban made marriage between a white and a non-white person seem as though there was something inherently wrong with two consenting adults in love marrying. As much of the same is said by supporters of Proposition 8 (a California proposition that banned same-sex marriage), I wonder what the real reasons are behind banning interracial and single-sex marriages. The historical ban on interracial marriage and the current ban on same-sex marriage support a racist and heterosexist ideology that claims that there are certain practices that are “normal,” and certain practices that are not, and should be looked down upon; these bans, by being unbending in the laws surrounding marriage, participate in the creation of social constructions of race, gender, and sexuality.

            The ban on interracial marriage, though now ruled unconstitutional, never failed to make me wonder exactly why the ban existed in the first place. It comes easily to me as a minority who was raised in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries to see that anti-miscegenation laws were wrong and should never have existed. However, when I was looking through different court cases, I was taken aback by what seemed to be the lack of rationales on the part of the judges. Instead of realizing that separating the whites from the non-whites would only further the belief that there was a superior race, judges repeatedly claimed that the separation of two races in marriage was a perfectly acceptable, and even positive thing. Considering the fact that “the miscegenation taboo notoriously had invidious racial connotations,” (Koppelman, 222) this is not surprising. While there are underlying racial supremacy connotations in anti-miscegenation laws, the big question is if those voting for anti-miscegenation are aware of why they are doing so. Koppelman also comments on this, saying “One can recognize what everyone knows that the miscegenation taboo is somehow linked to white supremacy, that the link is part of its implicit meaning” (222). While there is a link, Koppelman’s statement leads me to believe that “Americans” (“Americans” in this situation meaning white people) are born and raised in a society with an undercurrent of racism, with the idea that their race is superior to all others. In Loving v. Virginia, it is very clearly stated that there is a difference between a white and non-white person, and Virginia law gives a very clean-cut definition of what exactly a white person is, saying:
                 The term ‘white person’ shall apply only to such person as has no trace whatever of any blood other than Caucasian; but persons who have one-sixteenth or less of the blood of the American Indian and have no other non-Caucasic blood shall be deemed to be white persons. (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com)

By trying to create a boundary between different races, the ban on interracial marriage was enforcing a social construction that stated that there was a race that was superior to all other races. The ban, in a sense, is also claiming that race can be defined biologically (via blood lines). In creating, supporting, and enforcing these false claims, the hegemon/subaltern binary of white/non-white and what exactly made someone “non-white” permeated through society.

            Laws concerning gender and sexuality, in my experience, often tend to dovetail. I believe that this is because American society is cissexist (the ideology that gender and sex exist in harmony) and heterosexist, meaning that—In America—the gender binary is perfectly acceptable and should be conformed to. This is not the case with many modern LGBT Americans. For example, in the case of Littleton v. Prange, I saw that gender is not the only thing keeping same-sex couples from getting married. In the court case, Christie, who was born biologically male, had been transitioning to female from a young age. She married a man, and when he died, doctors claimed that she could not be a proper wrongful death beneficiary because she was “created a man,” (Greenberg, 752) which brings into question what actually makes up a person’s gender, and the difference between gender and sex. The question in this case seems to revolve around what factor should keep same-sex couples from being able to marry: gender identity or biologically assigned sex. Doctors who were brought forward to testify in the Littleton case asserted that Christie was medically a woman. However, “according to Justice Hardberger, Christie was born male and therefore she remained a male the rest of her life” (Greenberg, 752). In essence, this case was trying to determine what exactly made someone male or female, which supports the belief that gender is a binary and not a spectrum. In Greenberg’s “When is a Man a Man and a Woman a Woman,” she gives the medical criteria for sex as:
                 Genetic or chromosomal sex; gonadal sex; internal morphologic sex; external morphologic sex; hormonal sex; phenotypic sex; assigned sex/gender of rearing; and gender identity. (753)

These criteria don’t differentiate between sex and gender, which is what I felt needed to be done in the case of Christie. While she was born biologically male, she had altered more than half of the characteristics listed for sex to fit how she identified mentally. The gender binary of male/female in this case is asserted strongly, and the case is a part of what serves to reinforce that binary, and the social construct that a person’s sex and gender identity should be the same, especially for the purpose of marriage. Enforcing a gender binary, whatever the cause, however, is harmful to those who do not fit into one masculine or feminine category, as it makes them feel as though they do not belong in society at all. They are being looked down upon as a type of second class citizen. Americans who fit a gender binary, and who do conform to societal gender norms, don’t see this as a problem, simply because they can still marry freely who they fall in love with without a long and drawn out court process.

            Sexuality, however, is different in that many of the arguments used against interracial marriage have been recycled and used to create a negative stigma surrounding the LGB community. A recent example of this would be a small town in Oklahoma refusing to graduate two lesbians once the school found out they were living together. The principal, much like Justice Hardberger in the Littleton case, used his own beliefs to “guide” the teenagers. He is quoted as saying “Well, you're gay. You're not going to do anything with your life. You might as well just drop out now” (http://advocate.com).

The case that could come of this delves into what “fundamental rights” are actually fundamental to the gay community. While education is not a fundamental right, for it to be denied to youth is saying that their education, because they are a part of the LGBT community, is unimportant and is not important when compared to the education and well being of a straight student. I feel like this kind of a statement goes completely against the Equal Application Theory; if a straight student can be educated, regardless of their living situation, then it stands to reason that a gay or lesbian student should be able to receive education from the same school, regardless of their living conditions. As Ashley Lee says in her paper, “Sex-discrimination violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and, as a result, is classified as heightened scrutiny” (azhleee.blogspot.com/). To me, it stands to reason that if sex, gender, and sexual orientation are not choices that we get to make, then discrimination against someone who doesn’t conform to social norms about sexuality and gender should also violate the Equal Protection Clause, based on the logic of the Equal Application theory, and should receive heightened scrutiny. This unconstitutional ruling seems to me to be more about a fear of a successful, happy homosexual than it is about what is “right” for today’s America.


            It is important to remember, though, when dealing with sexuality, that every binary has a liminal space that is oft full of many different subgroups. For example, in the straight/non-straight binary, there are many people who would categorize themselves as bisexual, which opposes the binary. However, going deeper into the liminal space, there are terms such as pansexuality, which is liking a person regardless of their sex or gender expression (which brings the term “genderqueer” [not conforming to one gender or the other, also bigendered] into play). Terms such as asexuality also appear, which is a term used for a person who does not experience sexual attraction. In dealing with people who fall into these categories, I wonder how exactly a court of law would deal with a marriage case of someone who, on a given day, would identify as masculine, then another as feminine. It seems to me that one of the major flaws in the court is that many of the judges make their decisions based on the biologically assigned sex of the individual. In one case concerning a transsexual woman (in Re Gardiner Estate, Kansas [2002]), the court declared that “The words ‘sex,’ ‘marriage,’ ‘male,’ and ‘female’ in everyday understanding do not encompass transsexuals. The common, ordinary meaning of ‘persons of the opposite sex’ contemplates what is commonly understood to be a biological man and a biological woman. A post-operative male-to-female transsexual does not fit the common definition of a female” (http:// intersexinitiative.org). Had this phrase been left on its own, I would have no qualms with the argument, as a transsexual woman does not fit the “common definition of a female.” However, that is not the case, as the ruling goes on to say “A traditional marriage is the legal relationship between a biological man and a biological woman for the discharge to each other and the community of the duties legally incumbent on those whose relationship is founded on the distinction of sex” (http:// intersexinitiative.org). Saying this is making the argument that because transsexual persons do not conform to the gender binary, that they should not be allowed to marry, unless they do so to the opposite sex of that which they have been biologically assigned. However, as seen in the Littleton case, when more than half of one’s identifiers of sex have been changed, when do we consider that person to be biologically the sex/gender they identify as? Not allowing a trans person to marry takes away their fundamental right to marriage, and telling them that they can only marry based on their biologically assigned sex is enforcing a social construction that denies the existence of anything other than an unchanging gender binary.

            In modern America, today’s moral ideals have been created by a society that holds undercurrents of racism, cissexism, and heterosexism. That being said, I still believe that there is hope for an American who does not fall under what the dominant culture’s definition of normal is to grow and flourish as a person. By refusing to give up, there is a chance to overcome the negative stigmas surrounding race, sexuality, and gender, and the social constructions that force those minorities into confining and not all-defining binaries.





Works Cited



1.      The Advocate. "Lesbians Stopped From Graduating | News | The Advocate." Gay News | The Advocate | The World's Leading Source for LGBT News and Entertainment. N.p., 15 Nov. 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/11/15/Lesbian_Students_Stopped_from_Graduating/>
2.      The Asexual Visibility and Education Network. 2008. Web. 1 Dec. 2010. <http://www.asexuality.org/home/>.
3.      "Christie Lee Littleton Story -- Courts Negate Her 7-year Marriage." The WomynWeb Network. 13 May 2001. Web. 05 Dec. 2010. <http://christielee.net/main1.htm>.
4.      "Fundamental Rights." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 04 Dec. 2010. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_rights>.
5.      Greenberg, Julie. "When Is A Man a Man, and When is a Woman a Woman?" 52 Florida Law Review 4. September 2000.
6.      "In Re Gardiner Estate (2002)." Intersex Initiative. Web. 6 Dec. 2010. <http://www.intersexinitiative.org/law/in-re-gardiner-estate.html>.
7.      Koppelman, Andrew. "Why Discrimination Against Lesbians and Gay Men is Sex Discrimination." 69 New York University Law Review 197, 1994.
8.      Lee, Ashley. "CSP 19 Final Paper First Draft." Love for Life and Fashion. 06 Dec. 2010. Web. 08 Dec. 2010. <http://azhleee.blogspot.com/2010/12/csp-19-final-paper-first-draft.html>.
9.      "Loving v. Virginia." FindLaw: Cases and Codes. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=388&invol=1>.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Same-Sex Marriage

Goals:

  1. Give a basic history of marriage equality
  2. Discuss the arguments to/for marriage equality in MA, NY, WA, MD, NY, CA cases (as mentioned in Cox "A painful process...")
1993: Baehr v. Lewin -- HI marriage ase
1996: Defens of Marriage Act (DOMA) to stop the "tsunami of gay marriage coming over from HI" (Clinton signed into law)
1998: Baehr v. Miike (state loses at trial level)
1998: HI amends constitution to "give power to the legislature to regulate marriage"
1999: Baker v. State (Vermont supreme court rules all rights and benefits of marriage)
2000: VT becomes the first state to enact civil unions
2000: CA passes Proposition 22 (62% - 38%)
2003: Massachusetts, Goodridge decided 4-3 that the state doesn't even have a rational basis for denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples
2/12/2004: Mayor of San Francisco starts issuing marriage licenses for about 4 weeks (until CA supreme court tells them to stop)
2005: NJ case Lewis v. Harris (no marriage, but state must offer equal benefits to same-sex couples)
2005: Schwarzenegger vetoes marriage equality law, claiming that "the people have spoken" that they didn't want gay marriage
2005: CA comprehensive Domestic Partnership law goes into effect
2005: CT enacts civil unions
2006: NY case Hernandez v. Robles
2006: WA Andersen v. Icing County (this and previous: 4-3, upholding traditional marriage laws)
2006: MD Conaway v. Deane (same as previous, but maybe decision was 5-2
2008: CA in Remarriage cases (4-3, strikes down marriage laws) and CT Kerrigan v. Department of Public Health claims that civil unions aren't enough (4-3, marriage licenses to same-sex couples [immediately])
2008: Proposition 8 passes...
2009: Iowa varnum v. brien 7-0 in favor of marriage equality issues marriage licenses immediately
2009: VT, ME, NH, DC pass laws enacting marriage equality
2010: US district court rules Prop 8 violates the US Constitution, but it's still in effect kind of?

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Marriage and Citizenship

Goals:

  1. Introduce and discuss coverture concept
  2. Intersection of marriage rights and US citizenship
  3. Citizenship restrictions and marginalized groups (married women, non-white, LGBT, HIV, etc...)
Coverture: The (ancient) legal concept that on marriage, a woman becomes the property of her husband (see p. 83 of "Justice for All?"); she is subsumed
  • Find examples of modern echoes/vestiges of coverture
    • Still countries/religions that practice coverture in an extreme (the woman has no rights)
    • The woman takes the man's last name
    • Woman is expected to move in with the man and join his household
    • Husband's name comes first (Mr. and Mrs. _____________)
    • Child takes the last name of the father
    • Father of the bride gives away the daughter to the husband
    • Father/Husband is the head of the household
    • "Marital rape exception"
    • Wedding vows "to honor and obey"
    • "White dress" -- You should be pure
    • The phrase "rule of thumb"
Sorry my notes are lackluster today. I'm having a bad one.

Friday, October 22, 2010

The New Millenium

Goals:

  1. To discuss LGBT rights in the "modern era" or Miller's "gay movement" ('93 - now)
  2. What does liberation look like?
Significant LGBT events of The Gay Movement:
  • 12.31.1993: Brandon Teena found murdered
    • Transgender hate crime fictionalized/depicted in "Boys Don't Cry"
  • 11.5.2008: Prop 8 passes on Election Day (eliminating gay marriage in CA)
  • 10.18.1998: Matthew Shepard dies due to a violent hate crime in WY
  • 2.1.2008: Oregon comprehensive Domestic partnership goes into effect

Friday, October 15, 2010

Stonewall and the Birth of the Gay and Lesbian Liberation

Goals:
1.    Understanding the significance of Stonewall.
2.    Global view of 1960s – 1980s “gay liberation decades”

Stonewall:
·         Spark that ignited the modern Gay Rights Movement
·         Put the LGBT community on the map
·         Media attention
·         Example of spontaneous resistance to authority
·         No shame about being publicly identified as a part of the LGBT community
o   The beginning

What actually happened:
·         June 28th, 1969: Stonewall Inn was raided for serving drinks to homosexuals
·         There was a riot
o   The people in the bar were more violent/rough around the edges and prone to fight back than most others (they were more aggressive than what was considered the norm)
o   Out of the Past p. 336: “Suddenly, the paddywagon arrived and the mood of the crowd changed. Three of the more blatant queens—in full drag—were loaded inside, along with the bartender and doorman, to a chorus of catcalls and boos from the crowd. A cry went up to push the paddywagon over, but it drove away before anything could happen…The next person to come out was a dyke, and she put up a struggle—from car to door to car again. It was at that moment that the scene became explosive. Limp wrists were forgotten. Beer cans and bottles were heaved at the windows, and a rain of coins descended on the cops…
·         Cognitive Dissonance: when two concepts don’t quite match up
o   Sissy fairy and violence don’t exactly go hand in hand
o   The queers were fighting back!
·         Pre-Stonewall gay rights movement
o   “Homophile” movement
o   Closeted society
§  Daughters of Bilitis (lesbian group) and Mattachine Society

Gay Liberation Front (energy but no focus)

The Lavender Menace:
·         Conspiracy theory that lesbians would infiltrate the women’s movement

1970s:
·         January, 1977—Gay Rights measures repealed by popular vote
·         1977—Harvey Milk elected
·         March, 1978—Brriggs Initiative (first time we see people actively going against homosexuals [initiative saying that openly homosexual persons could not teach in public schools, and if you knew about a homosexual teacher and didn’t tell, you could lose your job as well])
·         November, 1978—Harvey Milk assassinated

1980s:
·         June, 1981—AIDS identified
·         Arch, 1984—“Bathhouse fight”
·         March, 1985—Aids test invented

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

The LGBT Comminuty in the 60s and 70s

Goals:
1. Understanding LGBT experience pre and post Stonewall (Then and Now)
2. Contestation and meaning of "Stonewall" and "liberation."

In case you forgot: Signifier (symbol, word), and Signified (cultural meaning with the signifier)

Then (60s and 70s):
  • Military: "homosexuality is incompatible with military service"
  • Law: Sodomy Laws, Gays and lesbians didn't have job safety, if you were found in a gay bar, you could be raided and arrested, no relationship recognition, cross-dressing statutes
  • Culture/Media: Gay wasn't a word that was allowed to be used in Village Voice, All gays portrayed in the movies were "campy," "queeny," and were usually killed off by the end of the third reel of the movie (until quite recently...past twenty to thirty years)
    • Kate Millett: forced to come out of the closet because it was assumed she was a lesbian. Otherwise, lesbians weren't very prominent in the media
    • Gays were seen as effeminite (sissy, fairy), lesbians were considered butch (killers or villains)
  • Science/Medicine: Homosexuality was considered a mental disease, electroshock therapy to "cure" homosexuality, "Straight Camp"
  • Religion: Sin to be gay in all religions
  • Government/Politics: Harvey Milk was the first openly gay man to be elected to government in the state of California, homosexuals treated like Communists as "invisible traitors"
  • School/Education: No out students until after college, Briggs initiative to ban openly gay teachers (can't reproduce so must recruit)


Now (2010):
  • Military: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" compromise is currently (as of today) enjoined
  • Law: Job protection is instated for gays and lesbians (in 20 states), gay marriage legal in five states, and civil unions in a few others, sodomy laws ruled unconstitutional in 2003, but they're still around
  • Culture/Media: LGBT community is not hidden in the media today, but there's still an undertone saying that homosexuality is wrong
    • There's a more positive light being shed on the LGBT community than forty years ago
  • Science/Medicine: People are trying to claim that homosexuality is a genetic defect, There is no cure for homosexuality because it is not a disease
  • Religion: Some gay-supportive religions
  • Government/Politics: There is a difference, but it's not a huge change. There are 3 openly gay (out of 435) in the House of Representatives
  • School/Education: Coming out earlier, GSAs in many schools (The Princes ad *embedded below*)

Monday, October 11, 2010

My Coming Out Story

I came out to my parents today. These were the reactions.
My father:
  • Me: I’m bisexual.
  • Daddy: (after a large bout of laughter) You think this is a surprise?
  • Me: I guess not. Let me tell mom.
  • Daddy: You’re going to kill your mother.
And then I was passed on to my mother. Let me just tell you that it was so much harder for my mother than it was for my dad. I asked how her day was and if she was sitting down, and then I just told her. And her first reaction was “What prompted this?” And then she asked “Do you think God is happy or sad with your choice? Or do you think he doesn’t care?” So I told her that I don’t think it’s a choice. And we basically just had a really awkward conversation where she asked if I was going to be a whore and she got mad at me because I didn’t want to have a humongous conversation out of it. She said I was being unproductive and “calling to drop a shock bomb and leave.” I just…I don’t even know.
But my dad. I love him. My mother will come around. I hope.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Ethnic Notions (Part 1)

Oh boy. I'm thoroughly prepared for some of the most racist video that I've ever seen right now.

Here's the transcript, if you're interested in looking at it (taken from http://newsreel.org/transcripts/ethnicno.htm):


Ethnic Notions Transcript
VOICE-OVER: A is for Aunty, de odes 'er all, she rocks all us chil'ren t' sleep in her shawl.
D is for Daniel, who tends to de do', he took care of massa, way back 'fo de woh.
F is for Felix, who won't do no wuk, he's lazy and shif'less and ready to shirk.
Z is for Zonia, chunky and small, but 'ere comes de Missus so I guess dis am all.


VIDEO/SYNC: (Cartoon) SCRUB ME MAMA WITH THE BOOGIE WOOGIE BEAT

"Listen, Mammy, that ain't no way to wash clothes. What you all need is rhythm!"

"Wh- wh- what do you all mean, rhythm?"

"Ha ha ha ha. I'll show you what I mean!" (music)

NARRATOR: The mammy … the pickaninny … the coon … the sambo … the uncle: Well into the middle of the twentieth century , these were some of the most popular depictions of black Americans

By 1941, when this cartoon was made, images like these permeated American culture.

These were the images that decorated our homes, that served and amused and made us laugh.

Taken for granted, they worked their way into the mainstream of American life. Of ethnic caricatures in America, these have been the most enduring.

Today there's little doubt that they shaped the most gut-level feelings about race.

LEVINE:
 When you see hundreds of them, uh in all parts of the country persisting over a very long period of time, they have to have meaning. They obviously appeal to people. They appeal to the creator, but the appeal also to the consumers, those who read the car - look at the cartoons, or read the novels, or buy the artifacts.

CHRISTIAN: It is not just that it's in the figurines, and the uhn coffee pots and so on, it is that we are seen that way, perceived that way, even in terms of public policy. And that our lives are lived under that shadow, and sometimes we then, even become to believe it ourselves.

LEVINE:
 Blacks don't really look like that. So why is it so appealing to people to think they look like that, and pretend they look like that, and to like to look at icons that look like that. You look at them often enough and black people begin to look like that, even though they don't. Um, so that they've had a great impact in our society.

They therefore tell us both about the inner desires of the people who create and consume them, and also they tell us about some of the forces that shape reality, for large portions of our population.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 UNCLE TOM'S CABANA

Well now chil'ren, ol' Uncle Tom's gon' tell you the real true story about Uncle Tom's Cabin

NARRATOR: Contained in these cultural images is the history of our national conscience striving to reconcile the paradox of racism in a nation founded on human equality - a conscience coping with this profound contradiction … through caricature.

What were the consequences of these caricatures? How did they mold and mirror the reality of racial tensions in America for more than 100 years?

VOICE-OVER: Laughing Ben: "I got a hat on my head, shoes on my feet, so what need I care, cuz I'm the luckiest coon in this town… (laughter)"

NARRATOR: In the early 1900's images and songs portrayed a simple, docile, laughing black man: the Sambo.

This image became one of the classic portrayals of black men in film.
Care free and irresponsible, the sambo was quick to avoid work while reveling in the easy pleasures of food, dance and song. His life was one of child-like contentment.

VIDEO/SYNC: RHAPSODY IN BLACK AND BLUE (film)

Man: Dog gonnit, can't this boy go to town! Listen here. Ha, ha, ha!

Woman: Come away from that old box.

Man: Well, can I help it 'cause I got an ear for music?

Woman: Yeah, that's all you got, is an ear for music, and a mouth for po'k chop. You better get a desire for work.

NARRATOR:
 The happy sambo began his stage life in the late 1820's … when a man named T.D. Rice brought a new sensation to American theater.

Rice was known as an Ethiopian delineator, a white comedian who performed in blackface. The name of his routine would later become the symbol of segregation in the South.

SLOAN:
 The Jim Crow was a dance that started on the plantation as a result of dancing being outlawed in 1690. Dancing was said to be crossing your feet by the church. And so the slaves created a way of shuffling and sliding to safely glide around the laws without crossing their feet.

NARRATOR:
 The slaves had a saying for their cunning in skirting the law.

SLOAN: 
"Wheel about, and turn about, and jump just so, every time I wheel about, I jump Jim Crow."

NARRATOR:
 According to legend, T.D. Rice saw a crippled black man dancing an exaggerated Jim Crow dance. Rice took the man's tattered clothes and that night imitated him on stage.

SLOAN:
 It was an instant success. And America loved it. And a bevy of imitators came about, uh literally hundreds of men tore up their clothes, discarded their their perfect dialects of the black man, and began to do this exaggerated character dance which became known as the Jim Crow character.

And so here we have Jim Crow, T.D. Rice, taking a dance which was altered by a law, from a man who was crippled, and exaggerating it again. And he had no intention of presenting the truth.

But what was bought by the majority of the people in Ohio, and the Louisiana Territory, and in, along the Erie Canal, was that this was a true image. And it was a devastating image.

People in small towns who had never seen blacks, you know, and suddenly saw Rice, bought that as a black image.

NARRATOR:
 In 1843, a group of blackface performers joined together to form a single troupe. Instead of delineators, they called themselves minstrels.

The minstrel show captivated broad audiences, mostly in the North, and emerged as America's first form of national popular entertainment.

Like movies today, successful minstrels played to the tastes and values of their audiences.

Jim Crow, reflecting popular demand, evolved in the singing dancing Sambo. This light-hearted figure became one of the most potent forces in the politics … of slavery.

TURNER:
 The minstrelry era really took off at the same time as the abolitionist movement took off.

And you could almost sort of chart the two. As there were people working to end slavery, people working to eradicate slavery, there were also people increasing the exaggerated portrayals that we find in the, in the minstrel material.

NARRATOR:
 Minstrel caricatures mirrored the prevailing belief that slavery was good for the slave since it drew upon his "natural" inferiority and willingness to serve. Slaves were content. The proof was offered in the image of the happy Sambo.

FREDRICKSON:
 The old plantation was presented as a kind of paradise. White Americans were being constantly bombarded by the image of happy slaves is what it amounted to. So slavery must be a good institution if if the slaves were happy and the masters were kindly. The, that whole cultural image of the benign, the beneficent institution was projected constantly in the period immediately before the Civil War.

VOICE-OVER:
 "So blessed with moderate work, with ample fare, With all the good the starving pauper needs, The happier slave on each plantation leads…"

"I am quite sure they never could become a happier people than I find them here… No tribe of people have ever passed from barbarism to civilization whose progress has been more secure from harm, more genial to their character, or better adapted to their intellectual feebleness, than the negroes…"

"So hand de Banjo down to play
We'll make it ring both night and day
And we care not what de white folks say,
Dey can't get us to run away."


NARRATOR:
 Time and again these sentiments were expressed in popular songs and novels before the Civil War. For many Americans North and South, the myth of Sambo resolved both the moral and political conflict of allowing slavery in a free society.

LEVINE:
 On the one hand, whites like to think of their blacks as sambos in the, in the antebellum period, but they could never have operated plantations with sambos and they knew that.

NARRATOR:
 The slavery debate grew more heated as the Civil War approached. Minstrels, playing to conservative sentiment, turned their attention to free blacks in the North, and a new character appeared beside the Southern Sambo: Zip Coon.

VOICE-OVER:
 TRANSCENDENTALISM:

Transcendentalism is dat spiritual cognoscence ob psychological irrefragibility, connected wid conscientient ademtion ob incolumbient spirituality and etherialized connection - which is deribed ob … inwisible atoms dat become ana-tom-ically tattable …

NARRATOR:
 A dandy, and a buffoon, Zip Coon's attempts to imitate whites mocked the notion of racial equality.

Together Zip Coon and Sambo provided a double-edged defense of slavery: Zip Coon, proof of blacks' ludicrous failure to adapt to freedom; and Sambo, the fantasy of happy darkies in their proper place.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 JUDGE PRIEST (film)

Mammy sings: I got to take down de judge's clothes. Got to take 'em in de house, yes Lord! Got to get out that ol' ironin' board - fix 'em up for de judge to wear. Hmmmmm, yes Lord! …

NARRATOR:
 When this film was released in 1934, the black Mammy had become such a staple figure in portraits of the Old South, it was hard to imagine a Southern home without her.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 JUDGE PRIEST

Mammy: Praise de Lord! Mr., Loom! Is you heah or is you ain't?

Man: Hi, Aunt Dillsie!

Mammy: How come you heah?

NARRATOR: 
Like the happy Sambo, the Mammy emerged as a defense of slavery. Plantation novels and minstrel shows presented her as fat, pitch-black, and happily obedient to her master and mistress.

VOICE/SYNC:
 JUDGE PRIEST

Mammy: You stay here. Us is gon kill de high-steppinest rooster in de yard 'n fix a great big bowl of milk gravy 'n grits -

Man: With waffles, too!

Mammy: Don't you worry now, honey, you'se home now. Mr. Loom's home! Mr. Loom's home! …

CHRISTIAN:
 She was always presented as docile, loyal, uh protective of the white house an, the big house, an indication that um, that she understood, um the value of the society.

She's presented almost as an antithesis of the white lady, the person who does not have the qualities of fragility and beauty which would make her valued in the society.

NARRATOR:
 With her hair hidden beneath a bandanna, her ample weight, dark skin and coarse manners, the Mammy was stripped of sexual allure.

Faithfully she served the master's household - in popular fiction and theater - but here her presence never evoked sexual tension.

CHRISTIAN:
 If the mammy were to be a sexual being, which of course in reality she was, but if she was, were to be that in myth, and in fiction and so on, she would become a threat to the mistress of the house, she would become a threat to the entire system. Uh she, because she would then be capable of being desired by the master of the house.

We know from reading the diaries and the letters of slave mistresses that this was very often the case, and created much disruption, much friction in this supposedly happy plantation system the planners wanted to project.

SONG:
 MAMMY JINNY'S JUBILEE

A brand new bandanna around mammy's head
You couldn't miss the color cause it surely am red!
Come on 'n shake your feet
Oh honey, shake your feet
To ol' Mammy Jinny's jig
Hee ha haa!…


NARRATOR:
 While happy in her subservience to whites, the mammy was portrayed quite differently in relations with her own family.

CHRISTIAN:
 In your usual set up, in American society, the person who controls is the male. The mammy is presented as the controller. What we have indicating quote unquote how inferior we are. That men are weak and women are strong, the very opposite of the way it's supposed to be according to the societal norms.

So the mammy strikes at two important concepts of gender in in um antebellum society. She is strong, asexual, and ugly when a woman is supposed to be beautiful, fragile, dependent. She is a controller of her own people, of the males in her own um society, uh, when the female should be dependent and subordinate. An indication clearly that black people can't make it.

NARRATOR:
 Freedom brought hope to black Americans.

Millions of emancipated slaves were inspired by the promise of equality.

But this promise was betrayed.

FREDRICKSON:
 Those who wanted to re-establish firm white control, who wanted to maintain white supremacy by any means possible, used the argument that what had happened, was that blacks no longer under the benign or beneficent or kindly guidance of white were reverting to savagery.

NARRATOR: Political debate manipulated public fears about the so-called "black menace."

Old stereotypes were adapted to the new politics. Increasingly blacks were identified as brutes.

VOICE-OVER:
 The states and people that favor this equality and amalgamation of the white and black races God will exterminate. A man cannot commit so great an offense against his race, against his country, against his God, as to give his daughter in marriage to a Negro, a beast.

NARRATOR:
 This climate of racial hysteria was seen in every aspect of popular culture.

FREDRICKSON:
 The best example of this was the writings of Thomas Dixon, in his novel The Clansman, which then later became a hit Broadway play, and finally was adapted as the most successful of early American pictures in "Birth of a Nation."

NARRATOR:
 Described by President Woodrow Wilson as "history writ in lightning" … Birth of a Nation captured on film the classic caricature of blacks following Reconstruction.

Here Emancipation was viewed as a tragic mistake: it had ended slavery and let loose blacks' wildest passions.

Brute Negroes, played by whites in blackface, pursued white virgins.

These images were guaranteed to incite racial violence. But more: they justified it.

PETERS:
 Earlier we wouldn't have gotten an image of a brute Negro… because this wouldn't have helped in the defense of slavery. Uh to suggest earlier too much that they were people who were very rebellious would've suggested that the blacks wanted to be free. The image that they needed was that blacks were docile in antebellum times.

During Reconstruction the black is a challenge to the political system and they have to not only then try to justify uh maybe a reason for going back to slavery, but they are also justifying their reasons for killing the blacks. Because they are saying that the blacks are an offense to civilization.

CHRISTIAN:
 These beings must be controlled is what the mythology is telling us. And at the same time in a very clever way because the planters also wanted to soothe people, wanted to make sure that they believed that their society could continue. They harken back to the good ol' days, and the good ol' days when everybody's happy, the happy darky. Um, a way of saying let's go back to those times, remember those good ol' times when -

SONG:
 POOR OLD NED

Oh there was an old darkie
And they called him Uncle Ned
But he died long ago, long ago.

And he had no wool
In the top of his head
In the place where the wool ought to grow.

So lay down de shovel and de hoe
And hang up de fiddle and de bow.
No more hard work for Poor Old Ned.
He's gone where the good darkies go…


FREDRICKSON: 
The older generation were still the faithful retainers of the slave era, and the newer generation, however, was out of control - the blacks who had grown up in the period since the Civil War had never known the domesticating influence of slavery.

CHRISTIAN:
 So you have this two-pronged attack on blacks. On one hand they're reduced to servile, harmless singing darkys of the good ol' times before the Civil War, what we really want to go back to. And you have an attack on supposedly what they've become now, vicious, brutal, um aggressive, violent.

NARRATOR:
 America at the turn of the century experienced unprecedented race-hatred.

Violence, Jim Crow segregation, mob terror became acceptable methods of social control. And always, to justify such atrocity, was the excuse of the animalistic, black brute.

Brute caricatures of black children - or "pickaninnies" as they were once called - showed them as victims.

Victims who evoked - not sympathy - but the feeling that blacks were subhuman.

TURNER: 
They're always on the river, in the uh, on the ground, in a tree, partially clad, dirty, their hair unkempt. This suggests that there was a need to imagine black children as animal-like, as savage. If you do that, if you make that step and say that these children are really like little furry animals then it's much easier to rationalize and justify the threat that's embodied in having an alligator pursuing the child.

VOICE-OVER:
 SEVEN LITTLE NIGGERS (poem)

Seven little niggers playing with bricks,
One was it most all de time,
Den de was but six.

Six little niggers fooling 'round de hive…


NARRATOR:
 One by one black children disappeared, targets of comic violence. The symbolism in these images was revealing.

VOICE-OVER:
 SEVEN LITTLE NIGGERS

Five little niggers playing dere was war,
Boom went the canon
Den dey was four…

TURNER: 
The material objects tell us that there was still a segment of the population at large that was very uncomfortable with the black presence in the New World and needed to express its need to get rid of them. Artistically rendering away, of removing blacks from the New World, so that there's nothing left.

VOICE-OVER:
 SEVEN LITTLE NIGGERS

One little nigger in the scorchin' sun,
Soon dey was de smell of smoke,
And den dey was none.


NARRATOR:
 As America crossed into the twentieth century, these images were inherited by vaudeville and motion pictures.

The forms were new, but the content was unchanged.

In the minstrel tradition, black roles in film were still played by whites in blackface.

When blacks finally began to play themselves, they faced a tragic dilemma.

SLOAN:
 By the time blacks came to the minstrel stage, they had to perform in blackface. And so you had black men darkening their already dark skin, with soot. And widening their mouths and and portraying themselves.

Rubin Crowder was a blackman from the Mid-West, who by the time he came to the minstrel stage had to take an Irish name. Because most minstrels were Irishmen performing black characters. Uh what you have here is a weird warping of the American fabric. You know, when a black man takes an Irish name, then impersonates the impersonator impersonating himself.

MOSS:
 So anybody who wanted to, who was black and wanted to get in the theater would do it like Pick and Pat, or Molasses and January … do what they do. Don't come telling me you can do Paul Lawrence Dunbar's poetry, or Georgie Douglas Johnson's poetry, no, nobody wants that. Give me a coon song. And one of these jokes.

SLOAN: 
These black actors perceived the minstrel show as a doorway, a doorway out of hunger, a doorway out of the south, a doorway to other opportunities… So we have an irony, or a Catch 22 as the saying goes, where we have an evolution of people into a theatrical workforce, at the same time that we have a perpetuation of a stereotype.

SONG:
 LAUGHING COON

I am the happy laughing coon
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Go down in de valley
And look for the moon
Ha ha ha ha ha…


NARRATOR:
 Against the broad spectrum of time-worn caricatures, the reality of black life in the early 1900s was undergoing dramatic change. In growing numbers, blacks were moving from the country to the city, from the South to the North.

Emancipation has disrupted the social order of the South; now black migration and competition for jobs threatened the status quo of the North.

Racial hostilities began to brew. New caricatures of the urban Coon emerged, reflecting the perceived threat of an expanding black labor force.

SONG:
 DARKTOWN IS OUT TONIGHT

Darktown is out tonight
Darktown is out tonight…

Yeow! Lay your money where mouth is.
Come on 'n shoot! Yeow!

Darktown is out tonight
Darktown is out tonight
Darktown is out -

Wait a minute! Wait a minute!
Where'd you get them red bones at?
What kinda dice is 'dese?

Don't start no argument now.

Cop, cop. Beat it, beat it.


NARRATOR:
 Dice, gambling, and a penchant for razor blades became trademarks of these urban caricatures.

SONG:
 DARKTOWN IS OUT TONIGHT

So fetch out your blazers
Bring out your razors
Darktown is out tonight!


NARRATOR:
 It was a variation on the old theme: blacks could be childishly entertaining and at once vicious brutes. The difference was in the instruments of amusement and violence.

SONG:
 RAZORS IN THIS WAR

"I don't suppose for a minute that any of coons is got a razor!"

"Oh, no, no!" (crowd)

"He ha ha ha. By the way, Cap'n can I j'in the army, too?"

"Certainly, why - report with James."

"Well if I j'in the army, can we use our razors in dis war?"

"Dat's it, dat's it, Cap'n, can we use our razors?"

"Well, I don't know. I'll have to see about it. Gidde-yap."

(Music)If they let us use our razors in this war,
We'd certainly cut de Germans to de core…
- Indeed we will -
We ain't no advertisers
But there'll be no doggone Kaisers
If they let us use our razors in dis war!


LEVINE:
 I think World War I was a watershed for blacks… they they had been told for so long, that if they played the game by the rules, that if they showed the white society what they're all about… if they uh made it up the hill by their own boot straps the society would say hey, welcome, join.

NARRATOR:
 But the service and self-esteem of black war veterans was undercut with caricature.
Symbolically these images reinforced white supremacy by fitting blacks within acceptable roles as servants and entertainers.

The reality of black servicemen who now bore arms and demanded the freedom and opportunity at home they'd fought for abroad - this reality inflamed many whites.

Race riots swept the North each summer from 1919 to 1921.

It was a period of overt and casual racism.

LEVINE:
 It was perfectly polite for whites in the North, educated college types, to write in high-toned journals like Harper's and The Atlantic and Scribner's to use words like nigger, and coon, and darky.

SONGS:
 Eenee, Meenee, Minee Mo

Catch a nigger by the toe
If he won't work,
Then let him go.
Goo-dum, goo-dee, goo-deedle deedle deedle

"Ooooh, it's hard, it's hard, it's hard
To be a nigger, nigger, nigger
It's hard, it's hard
Cuz you can't get your money when it's due…"

NARRATOR:
 Within these distorted molds of black behavior, black entertainers necessarily had to fit, to win acceptance from mainstream audiences.

Over time black performers brought elements of humanity to the caricatures.

Still, popular entertainment remained double-edged in its rewards, creating personal suffering and a stigma as the price of success. Perhaps no more poignant example exists than in the life of Bert Williams.

SONG:
 NOBODY

When life seems full of clouds and rain
And I am full of nothin' and pain,
Who soothes my thumpin bumpin brain?
Nobody…


NARRATOR
: A tall dignified man who spoke precise English, Bert Williams stooped his shoulders and learned to talk in the minstrel imitation of black dialect.

With the final touch of blackface he became America's pre-eminent blackface artist.

SKIT:
 BERT WILLIAMS MONOLOGUE

Oh I know what you're thinking, I mean I have heard all the rumors myself. It seems that this blackface makeup, with my gloves and my comic gait ain't the only thing I'm becoming famous for. Or is it… infamous?

SLOAN:
 I have been trying to finish Bert's show for him. And uh, my eulogy to Bert will be to finish the finale, you know, on his life, by elevating him to the class of a folk artist, and a folk hero that I think he deserves.

SKIT:
 BERT WILLIAMS MONOLOGUE

Well now take last night for example. I had just finished my show and I was about to step out form my evening constitution when I came upon what appeared to be a perfectly delightful watering hole. So I stepped up tot he bar and I asked the man for a bourbon.

Well, the fella didn't take too kindly to serving a Negro. And so, to impress his friends he said, that will be fifty dollars. Hell I didn't bat an eye. I just stepped up to the bar, reached down into my pocket, whipped out a five hundred dollar bill and said, "I'll take ten."

You know, it ain't really that funny. I mean, every critic in town agrees that I'm at the height of my career. Ziegfield pays me $6,500 a week here at the Follies, and that's top pay, but do I get top billing? Hell I can play before the crown heads of Europe, but I can't even get a drink in my neighborhood pub.
Y'know, they got this rule at the press club that says a black man can't even enter without a white host who is willing to sign that he'll be responsible for the black man's actions. Ain't I a responsible human being?

There ain't a night that passes that somebody don't knock on that door and invite me to the press club for a drink. Well in case you didn't remember buddy, this ain't exactly my regular skin tone, and it takes considerably longer to remove blackface then you could imagine. So unless somebody waits around, I wait around.

That's right. I wait around outside the press club, just shifting my weight from one foot to the next until somebody comes by and escorts me in. All the time I'm just hoping and praying that nobody comes out and mistakes me for the doorman, and tips me a quarter. You know, it's no disgrace being a black man, but it's terribly inconvenient.

SONG:
 I ain't never done nothin to nobody
I ain't never done nothin to nobody, no time.


NARRATOR:
 Toward the end of his life, Bert Williams managed to remove the most offensively racist material from his routines. But long after his death, the blackface tradition continued, its dark mask now transferred to talking movies.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 TRAILER FOR "THE JAZZ SINGER"

I am privileged to say a few words to you, in this most modern and novel manner. Privileged, because it's the first living xylophone announcement ever made, announcing the coming of on of the year's outstanding pictures. What is the picture? Well, of course, you've guessed that I'm referring to Warner Brothers' supreme triumph, Al Jolson, in "The Jazz Singer."

NARRATOR:
 When All Jolson made his film debut in "The Jazz Singer," Hollywood had emerged as the dominant force in popular entertainment.

By 1927, more than 26 million Americans were going to the movies each week. What they saw reaffirmed a tradition of blackface entertainment that had prevailed since slavery.

LEVINE:
 Why should hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions over the years, of white people in all parts of the country have gone to theaters and watched white men pretend they were black.

I think in part, in part what they were watching was more complicated that merely whites masking themselves as blacks. They were watching whites release themselves as blacks. Suddenly these whites, who were just like them, could dance and caper around, and sing, and tell jokes, and act openly and show emotions openly and cry and laugh and uh…

I think there was a kind of catharsis about this. And I think blacks have played that role in this society, they have been a kind of surrogate.

SONG:
 Al Jolson's "MAMMY"

Mammy, I'm comin'
Oh God! I hope I'm not late.
Mammy, don't you know me?
It's you little baby?

I'd walk a million miles
For one of your smiles
My Mamm - Mammy!


NARRATOR:
 From the twenties through World War II, blackface permeated motion pictures - When this mask was abandoned, its imprint still warped film images of blacks, even when blacks played themselves.

VIDEO/SYNC: JUDGE PRIEST

"Take this dime, now, and hurry on back to town and get me that beef liver."

"All right, suh."

"Hurry up, now."

"All right, suh, I'm practically runnin now."

"You gon put your shoes on?"

"I'm a save 'em in case my feet wear out … and then I'll have em."

NARRATOR:
 Of all media, cartoons provided the best form for racial caricature. In this fantasy word, physical distortion and violence were comic.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 BUGS BUNNY

Elmer Fudd: Before you die, you can make one last wish.

Bugs Bunny: Yeah. Well, let's see now, I wish uh, I wish uh, I wish I was in Dixie. (starts singing)

Bugs Bunny: Fantastic! Isn't it.

NARRATOR:
 Together songs, books like Little Black Sambo, and moving pictures captivated the young. But more: they shaped impressionable minds to view stereotypes as not only acceptable, but funny.

SKIT: LITTLE BLACK SAMBO

And when Big Black Jumbo coming home from work with a brass kettle under his arm for Black Mumbo, saw what was left of the tigers and said, "What elegant melted butter."

And when Black Mumbo saw the melted butter she said, "Now we'll all have pancakes for supper."

"I'm Little Black Sambo 'n it's my birthday 'n I'm gonna eat a-hundret and sixty-nine pancakes."

NARRATOR:
 Businesses, too, profited from the public's affection for these images.

Pancakes, beans, syrup, tobacco, oysters: blacks appeared on these and more in product labels and household knick-knacks.

CHRISTIAN:
 The cumulative effect of these images produced over and over again, seen over and over again, images that are notions of the home, merely amusing notions, become really destructive stereotypes, notions of the mind.

NARRATOR:
 How did these images shape enduring attitudes toward black culture, behavior, appearance?

VOICE-OVER:
 Her cheek, her chin, her neck, her nose
This was a lily, that was a rose;
Her bosom, sleek as Paris plaster,
Her up two bowls of Alabaster.


NARRATOR: 
This was the standard of beauty once heralded in America - a standard inherited from Europe. Against this image of perfection, Africans and African-Americans were compared.

FAULKNER:
 Historically, these images reinforce the psychology that black is ugly. To be natural, or to be yourself, or to be the way you were presented in this world is ugly.

My lips don't look like large pieces of liver. My eyes aren't snow white, or bulging in a frightening appearance. I wear my hair natural, but it isn't standing all over my head, as though I'm wearing a fright wig … the total distortion of the black image.

CHRISTIAN:
 In these images a subliminal message is clear: we can see how the portrayal of distinctive features of blacks become not only laughable but grotesque.

NARRATOR: 
Cartoons like this popularized the belief that black Americans had descended from savages.

FREDRICKSON: 
To use the 19th century cliché which prevailed almost up to our own time, Africa was the dark continent, it was the place where civilization had made the least progress, indeed it was the center of anti-civilization, or primitivism of all kinds.

NARRATOR:
 According to myth, slavery, then segregation had managed to "domesticate" black Americans. But without white control, blacks reverted to savagery.

In the 1920s and 30s the savage stereotype acquired a new dimension.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 THE EMPEROR JONES(film)

Brutus Jones: Looka here white man. I comes and I goes. And that's my business.

White Man: Oh, ho, ho. Not afraid to stand up to your betters and tell them what's what.

FREDRICKSON:
 It was a lot of talk about the New Negro, during the 1920s, of blacks being able to assert their manhood, their independence. But at the same time, there was a strain of the older ideas that persisted .. the idea of … reversion to savagery, except that savagery was now redefined.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 THE EMPEROR JONES

Brutus Jones: Ha, ha, ha, go ahead, fire again. Empty your guns. Ha, ha, ha. Don't you knows I'se got a charm. Takes a silver bullet to kill Brutus Jones.

FREDRICKSON:
 A very good example of this would be Emperor Jones, the sort of notion if blacks were true to themselves, they would be noble savages perhaps, but still savages… So again you're dealing with the stereotype, except you're taking the stereotype of the black savage and you're giving it a more positive evaluation.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 THE EMPEROR JONES

Brutus Jones: Oh lord, lord, lord, yeaah!

NARRATOR:
 The more comforting images of the Mammy, Sambo, and Uncle posed no threat. Happily they entertained and served.

Through this romantic fantasy generations of Americans from the Civil War to this day escaped concern or responsibility for racism.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 "From way down south in Dixie, where dancing is a natural heritage of the Negroes."

NARRATOR:
 From the beginning, popular entertainment was dominated by dancing, singing darkies.

SONG:
 Take your partners to the cake walk! First couple - promenade!
NARRATOR:
 From the Cake Walk to the jitterbug, an image was forged that blacks, with in-born
rhythm and musical talent, were indifferent to poverty, subservience, segregation - as slaves they danced even at their own auction block.

Black's greatest joy, however, came in providing service to whites. Even their clothing revealed delight in their inferiority.

TURNER:
 They are only portrayed in full clothing that's neat and attractive to look at, if they wear a uniform of some type… a part of the uniform is a big smile.

The smile says to the person looking at the object, this man's happy to carry my bags. This woman is happy to make my pancakes. These people are happy to spend their lives serving the white population…

They're happy to be confined in this way, an never devote any energy to thinking about themselves as oppressed.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 DARKIES NEVER DREAM sung by Ethel Waters

Darkies never dream
They must laugh and sing all day …


NARRATOR:
 The Civil Rights movement brought deep contradictions in America to a head. Restrictive molds cast before the Civil War finally began to crumble … 100 years later.

VIDEO/SYNC:
 DARKIES NEVER DREAM

Darkies never dream.
Who would ever hear our sad lament? …


NARRATOR:
 In the end Ethyl Water's melancholy song yielded to a more triumphant call.

VOICE-OVER:
 Martin Luther King's "I Have A Dream"

…So this afternoon I have a dream, it is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream, I have a dream…

…The sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave-owners will be able to live together as brothers. I have a dream…

They will be judged on the basis of the content of their character, not the color of their skin. I have dream this afternoon…

I have a dream this evening that one day we will recognize the words of Jefferson that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator…

NARRATOR:
 By the mid-sixties, world attention was focused on the brutal reality of American racism. In this climate of national embarrassment and gradual reform, happy images of the past rang hollow.

Slowly popular culture adapted to the new tide in politics and attitudes.

SONG:
 AIN'T GONNA LET NOBODY TURN ME AROUND

Ain't gonna let nobody turn me around
Keep on a walkin
Keep on a walkin
Marchin on the freedom trail
Freedom, freedom, freedom…


NARRATOR:
 By the late sixties, the more extreme caricatures had begun a slow death. But did this mean an end to the more subtle forms of racial stereotyping?

FREDRICKSON:
 The images of the past I think are still, are still with us. They may be altered in some ways and used in different ways. On example of this would be the figure that might be called the black Rambo.

This is the black cop, or the black detective, or the black sidekick of the white detective, whatever it might be, who is engaged in fighting the forces of evil. Uh the reason I say that this goes back to the old stereotype is that there's an emphasis on violence and brutality, it's as if these characters, as opposed to at least some of the white characters, are given a license to be even more violent, uh than the, the white, the white heroes. That there's, that the filmmaker, or the maker of the TV program is sort of capitalizing on the stereotype of blacks as being violent or brutal even though now they're on the right side.

TURNER:
 When I look at the material from the 1970s and the 1980s, I basically see the same thing I saw, I see in the earlier material. I see greeting cards with big, happy mammies on them. I see TV programs with a mammy figure in the household. I see black comedians playing the role of the minstrel or the buffoon in movies and so forth.

CHRISTIAN:
 I have students, both black and white, who believe these images, huh, because it has become a thread throughout the major fiction, film, popular culture, the songs, even the jokes black people make about themselves. It has become a part of our psyche. It's a real indication that one of the best ways of maintaining a system of oppression has to do with the psychological control of people.

NARRATOR:
 Mammy … Sambo … Pickaninny … Coon … Uncle: the great-grand parents of many modern images of blacks, these caricatures did as much harm as any lynch mob. True their hurt was often indirect, yet because of this they left wounds that have proved far more difficult to heal.
These are their descendants.

As we turn to contemporary culture, how will we judge? What do these images reveal - about our innermost fears, our hopes, our most enduring fantasies?

SLOAN:
 There is nothing wrong with singing and dancing, you know. That there is nothing wrong with tap dancing, there is nothing wrong with using your voice and your body as a musical instrument…
It is the laughter, and the music, and the dancing at the exclusion of dramatic images, of realistic images, which is at fault. And it's this exclusion which we hope to dissolve.

END